Extinction on My Mind /2
Women and Machines
Technology is the single most successful means of separating us from reality
By Randi Hacker
July 25, 2024
I have a dear friend who believes that women and machines will save us.
“Women and machines will save us,” he says, often enough that either one or both of his closest woman friends and/or his wife often ends up saying, “No women and machines talk now.” He’s very good-natured about it and, in fact, I based a character in my climate fiction novella on him and his conviction, but my friend says I didn’t really present it the way he would.
By us, of course, my friend means humans but, also, just more incidentally, the earth because that’s where we live, and, as it happens, he lives on a particularly beautiful piece of earth in Northern Vermont.
My friend believes that humans are sure to come up with technologies that will change everything for the better…
By machines, of course, my friend means technology. My friend believes that humans are sure to come up with technologies that will change everything for the better and fix it so that no one will have to work and no one will have to give up any of the things that make earth the comfortable, convenient, and entertaining planet we humans want and expect it to be.
On this point, my friend and I could not disagree more. Under my perspective (as one of my EFL students once said), far from saving us, technology is the breaker of the camel’s back. Under my perspective, technology is the single most successful means of separating us from reality that we, as a species, have ever come up with, and that includes liposuction, penile implants, plug-in air fresheners, and tooth whitening strips.
And when I say technology, of course I mean cyber technology.
And when I say cyber technology, of course, I mean cell phones.
Cell phones give us our own personal realities, and they put them in our hands so we can carry them with us. We look at our cell phones when we’re walking. We look at our cell phones when we’re at a play, or a museum, or a movie. Our cell phones are beside our plates when we eat in restaurants and beside our beds when we go to sleep at night. They’ve replaced the cigarettes we had with our morning coffee and, if movies are to be believed, the cigarettes we had after sex.
‘So save us? Hell no. Technology is going to remove us so many degrees from registering our extinction that it’s going to hasten our extinction.’
And when we’re not looking at our cell phones, we’re thinking about them and where they are and whether that text we’ve been waiting for has come in.
Our viewpoint has narrowed so much that almost anything that happens beyond the edge of the screen might as well be peripheral if not apocryphal.
And so we keep on mining lithium, and making batteries, and moving up to 5G, and pulling on our Quest3, and putting on our Bluetooth headphones and tuning out the ambient sounds of roaring of leaf blowers, and switching to Augmented Reality on our Smart glasses and walking down a street in Manhattan or Mumbai or Sydney or Helsinki or Siberia on a sweltering, muggy, yellow day but seeing someone – maybe our own avatar – swimming with a sea turtle in the aquamarine waters of the tropics.
So save us? Hell no. Technology is going to remove us so many degrees from registering our extinction that it’s going to hasten our extinction.
And you know, there are days, days, for example, when the Supreme Court makes a president a king, days when another turtle shows up at a rehab centre with a wasp-waisted shell from a six-pack ring, days when I am in the Museum of Natural History dinosaur room, and a kid in a stroller is playing a game on his tablet, and days when I come across things like this in Wal-Mart that I think they can’t hasten it fast enough for me.
And as for women, well, I think we’re beyond what even we can do.
Feature image: cottonbro studio – Pexels
Other articles by Randi Hacker
Other recent articles
Randi Hacker has been a writer and editor since the 20th century, and she’s been writing about the environment for more than thirty years, mostly to empower young people to take agency in their future. Satirical essays written with a partner appeared in the New York Times Book Review, Punch and Spy, among other publications. Her YA novel, Life As I Knew It, (Simon & Schuster) was named one of the Books for the Teen Age by the NY Public Library, and her TV show, Windy Acres, written with Jay Craven, was nominated for a New England Emmy for Writing. She just retired from her position as the resolutions copy editor for the State of Vermont, a job that has forever damaged her relationship with the comma. randihacker.com
Well said, Randi. I personally do not see much sense of urgency over our dwindling Natural world; we are sleep-walking and furiously guarding at the same time, the status quo. The human race is hurtling towards out- of- control climate catastrophe and all the warnings are being conveniently ignored.
Thanks for another interesting essay. Here are some comments .
Machines are with us. They do not separate us from reality. They are part of reality. We need to understand them better, and respect and value them in the same sense that we need to understand and respect and value humans, animals, plants, air, water, etc.
Technology is evolving very fast. The consequences of the evolution of technology, say over the past 500 yrs, are at least of the magnitude as the consequences of the evolution of humans, say over the last 100k years.
One of the most optimistic consequences of machine evolution seems to me to be the empowerment of women. I believe they are related. And I believe that empowered women can mitigate human source risks.
Also, I believe that machines, being creatures somewhat independent of humans, will have different e-styles and e-motives than humans. Vive la difference.
For now , there is still a lot we don’t know , and probably a lot to be afraid of. We don’t yet know whether, on the whole, machines will e-like us, e-respect us, e-try to take good e-care of us. We don’t know . But there is room for optimism.
I think it makes sense to be optimistic that machines will make things better. But many good folks are afraid and pessimistic and believe that machines are accelerating planetary and human destruction , even extinction.
You could also say that humans, with or without machines, are the biggest known threat to themselves and the planet. It’s conceivable, and optimistic, to imagine that machines could mitigate or eliminate some of the human source threats. And I don’t mean by eliminating the humans, as in a lot of sci-fi. I mean by actually making things better. Better conditions, better decisions, healthier, happier, … Why not?
Your Friend Ralph